| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-8700


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-8700 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-8700 gets 389 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8700 is 2.7 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ea
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
75.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
388.95k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.48k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
18.31k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.88k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
13.45k (x1.28)
TOTAL
38.92k
42.12k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
27.35k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
124.94k (x3.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
43.23k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
7.08k (x1.05)
TOTAL
65.01k
202.61k (x3.12)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
16.45k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
23.74k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
6.24k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
13.43k (x2.37)
TOTAL
28.56k
59.86k (x2.1)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
100.94k (x3.99)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
159.09k (x4.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
43.61k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
6.59k (x0.95)
TOTAL
87.45k
310.23k (x3.55)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
16.57k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
25.52k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
6.01k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
12.82k (x1.21)
TOTAL
54.03k
60.92k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
101.85k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
170.31k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
43.12k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
7.11k (x1.06)
TOTAL
143.94k
322.39k (x2.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
29.25k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
25.98k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
6.05k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
13.74k (x1.27)
TOTAL
65.64k
75.01k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
182.56k (x3.12)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
159.9k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
38.18k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
8.31k (x1.22)
TOTAL
142.69k
388.95k (x2.73)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2809 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
587 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5984 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-8700
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6358 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2986 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16307 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4