| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-7700HQ


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
208.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.82k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
15.49k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.96k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
8.82k (x0.84)
TOTAL
38.92k
33.09k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
14.15k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
65.81k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
22.41k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
5.21k (x0.77)
TOTAL
65.01k
107.57k (x1.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
13.75k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
19.69k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.19k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
8.92k (x1.57)
TOTAL
28.56k
47.55k (x1.67)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
52.55k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
86.47k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
23.02k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
5.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
87.45k
167.43k (x1.91)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
13k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.34k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
4.77k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
6.95k (x0.66)
TOTAL
54.03k
45.05k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
52.7k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
89.69k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
22.49k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
4.3k (x0.64)
TOTAL
143.94k
169.17k (x1.18)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
23.27k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
20.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.76k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
7.92k (x0.73)
TOTAL
65.64k
56.29k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
93.11k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
89.03k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
21.29k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
4.9k (x0.72)
TOTAL
142.69k
208.33k (x1.46)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
4629 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4