| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-6700


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-6700 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
506e3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
57.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
243.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
24.83k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
21.82k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.98k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
6.14k (x0.57)
TOTAL
65.64k
57.76k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
109.79k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
102.39k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
24.72k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
6.51k (x0.95)
TOTAL
142.69k
243.4k (x1.71)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
3745 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6206 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4