| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-4720HQ


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 132.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306c3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
132.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.79k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
9.64k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.34k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
3.76k (x0.36)
TOTAL
38.92k
21.53k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
11.66k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
37.71k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
16.38k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
5.94k (x0.88)
TOTAL
65.01k
71.69k (x1.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
20.68k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
10.28k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.87k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
4.29k (x0.4)
TOTAL
65.64k
40.12k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
66.84k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
42.85k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
16.77k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
5.88k (x0.86)
TOTAL
142.69k
132.35k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1422 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5745 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
11143 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4