Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-10700
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 3.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 3.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16386 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
30.66k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
25.64k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.98k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
12.25k (x1.13)
TOTAL
65.64k
74.53k (x1.14)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
240.28k (x4.11)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
234.3k (x4.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
56.12k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
7.02k (x1.03)
TOTAL
142.69k
537.73k (x3.77)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4