| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-8500


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-8500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-8500 gets 307.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ea
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
69.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
307.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.19k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.38k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.46k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
11.92k (x1.13)
TOTAL
38.92k
38.96k (x1)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
27.67k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
94.07k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
29.05k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
4.39k (x0.65)
TOTAL
65.01k
155.18k (x2.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
15.22k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
22.02k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.75k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
12.17k (x2.15)
TOTAL
28.56k
55.17k (x1.93)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
87.78k (x3.47)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
126.73k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
32.93k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
4.22k (x0.61)
TOTAL
87.45k
251.65k (x2.88)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
15.21k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
22.94k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.54k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
11.39k (x1.08)
TOTAL
54.03k
55.07k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
79.52k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
107.78k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
31.89k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
13.37k (x2)
TOTAL
143.94k
232.55k (x1.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
27.36k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
24.27k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.69k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
11.77k (x1.09)
TOTAL
65.64k
69.09k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
144.77k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
129.04k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
29.53k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
4.18k (x0.61)
TOTAL
142.69k
307.52k (x2.16)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1985 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
454 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
4731 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-8500
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6673 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5920 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2870 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16850 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4