| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-5675R


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
40671
Core
Ice Lake-U
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.14k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
14.35k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.94k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
5.47k (x0.52)
TOTAL
38.92k
28.91k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
16.02k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
54.6k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
18.69k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
16.87k (x2.5)
TOTAL
65.01k
106.18k (x1.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
12.86k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
16.85k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.19k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
5.49k (x0.97)
TOTAL
28.56k
40.39k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
50.07k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
64.61k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
19.84k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
17.09k (x2.47)
TOTAL
87.45k
151.6k (x1.73)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
12.88k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
18.27k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.12k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
5.45k (x0.51)
TOTAL
54.03k
41.72k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
49.91k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
70.3k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
19.69k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
16.92k (x2.53)
TOTAL
143.94k
156.83k (x1.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
21.91k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
18.59k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.2k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
5.72k (x0.53)
TOTAL
65.64k
51.43k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
84.92k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
72.09k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
20.13k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
17.07k (x2.5)
TOTAL
142.69k
194.2k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4