| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-10600K


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 2.5 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
352.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
30.11k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
26.16k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
6.01k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
10.77k (x1)
TOTAL
65.64k
73.05k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
158.82k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
150.39k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
36.56k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
7.11k (x1.04)
TOTAL
142.69k
352.88k (x2.47)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4