| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i3-6100


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
506e3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
112.28k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.81k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
15.65k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.14k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
4.28k (x0.41)
TOTAL
38.92k
28.89k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
7.75k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
37.33k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
12.13k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
3.56k (x0.53)
TOTAL
65.01k
60.77k (x0.93)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
13.76k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
19.96k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.44k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
4.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
28.56k
43.55k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
28.99k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
45.75k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
12.72k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
3.68k (x0.53)
TOTAL
87.45k
91.14k (x1.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
13.78k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
21.21k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.2k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
3.73k (x0.35)
TOTAL
54.03k
43.92k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
29.02k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
49.55k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
12.3k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.28k (x0.49)
TOTAL
143.94k
94.15k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
22.89k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
21.04k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.9k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
4.01k (x0.37)
TOTAL
65.64k
52.84k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
50.05k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
47.13k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
11.38k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
3.72k (x0.55)
TOTAL
142.69k
112.28k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4