Core i5-1035G4 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
906c0
Core
Ice Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
10.08k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
10.11k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
4.06k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.36k (x0.42)
TOTAL
28.56k
26.6k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
36.86k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
38.51k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
15.17k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.72k (x0.39)
TOTAL
87.45k
93.26k (x1.07)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4