| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 7 5800X


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.9 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a20f12
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
89.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
558.41k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.98k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
20.57k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
12.22k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
28.62k (x2.72)
TOTAL
38.92k
66.39k (x1.71)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
35.09k (x3.88)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
171.84k (x5.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
107.67k (x7.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
10.83k (x1.61)
TOTAL
65.01k
325.43k (x5.01)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
18.06k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
25k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
12.8k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
29.51k (x5.21)
TOTAL
28.56k
85.37k (x2.99)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
125.71k (x4.97)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
196.66k (x5.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
113.22k (x6.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
9.92k (x1.43)
TOTAL
87.45k
445.51k (x5.09)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
18.1k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
26.41k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
12.39k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
26.06k (x2.46)
TOTAL
54.03k
82.95k (x1.54)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
125.9k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
233.26k (x3.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
109.66k (x4.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
10.21k (x1.52)
TOTAL
143.94k
479.02k (x3.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
24.3k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
26.46k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
12.18k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
26.58k (x2.46)
TOTAL
65.64k
89.53k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
187.4k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
246.12k (x4.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
113.16k (x5.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
11.74k (x1.72)
TOTAL
142.69k
558.41k (x3.91)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2344 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5170 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5631 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
5656 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
19049 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4