| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
860f01
Core
Ice Lake-U
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
16.59k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
23.51k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
9.38k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
7.98k (x0.74)
TOTAL
65.64k
57.47k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
152.43k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
195.79k (x3.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
83.2k (x4.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
5.38k (x0.79)
TOTAL
142.69k
436.8k (x3.06)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4