| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 3.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
508.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
17.57k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
27.38k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
9.35k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
23.9k (x2.21)
TOTAL
65.64k
78.2k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
176.08k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
219.88k (x3.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
100k (x4.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
12.93k (x1.9)
TOTAL
142.69k
508.89k (x3.57)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
4847 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4