| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
800f11
Core
Ice Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
13.95k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
22.02k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.17k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
16.61k (x1.57)
TOTAL
54.03k
57.75k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
120.59k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
197.34k (x3.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
56.83k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.41k (x0.96)
TOTAL
143.94k
381.16k (x2.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
12.65k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
20.95k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.63k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
14.47k (x1.34)
TOTAL
65.64k
52.69k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
101.78k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
177.57k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
47.18k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
6.78k (x1)
TOTAL
142.69k
333.31k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4