| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 5 5625U


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5625U is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a50f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Barcelo
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
281.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
18.57k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
22.03k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
9.55k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
20.5k (x1.9)
TOTAL
65.64k
70.65k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
92.92k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
128.4k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
54.82k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
5.13k (x0.75)
TOTAL
142.69k
281.26k (x1.97)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
18750 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4