| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.2k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.36k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
7.5k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
23.79k (x2.26)
TOTAL
38.92k
52.85k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
22.11k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
108.04k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
56.81k (x3.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
36.39k (x5.4)
TOTAL
65.01k
223.36k (x3.44)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
15.38k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
21.94k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
7.97k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
24.76k (x4.37)
TOTAL
28.56k
70.05k (x2.45)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
96.91k (x3.83)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
135.12k (x3.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
70.39k (x3.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
56.43k (x8.16)
TOTAL
87.45k
358.85k (x4.1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
15.04k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.95k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
8.57k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
21.71k (x2.05)
TOTAL
54.03k
66.27k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
94.36k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
141.73k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
69.38k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
32.72k (x4.89)
TOTAL
143.94k
338.19k (x2.35)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
16.04k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
24.47k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
8.38k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
21.66k (x2)
TOTAL
65.64k
70.55k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
113.63k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
143.55k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
63.84k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
27.34k (x4.01)
TOTAL
142.69k
348.35k (x2.44)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4