| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.8k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.38k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.17k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
3.16k (x0.3)
TOTAL
38.92k
29.52k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
15.28k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
76.44k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
27.48k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
3.02k (x0.45)
TOTAL
65.01k
122.2k (x1.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
13.95k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
20.7k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.33k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
3.03k (x0.53)
TOTAL
28.56k
43.01k (x1.51)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
58.56k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
92.95k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
28.55k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
87.45k
183.04k (x2.09)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
13.04k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
22.35k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.37k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
3.4k (x0.32)
TOTAL
54.03k
44.15k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
56.49k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
100.74k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
28.21k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.04k (x0.45)
TOTAL
143.94k
188.49k (x1.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
14.2k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
23.23k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.35k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
5.18k (x0.48)
TOTAL
65.64k
47.96k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
58.24k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
105.72k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
28.73k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
5.59k (x0.82)
TOTAL
142.69k
198.27k (x1.39)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4