| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
800f11
Core
Ice Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.95k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
18.36k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.39k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
17.35k (x1.65)
TOTAL
38.92k
45.06k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
19.47k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
77.19k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
15.4k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
12.25k (x1.82)
TOTAL
65.01k
124.3k (x1.91)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
14.63k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
24.09k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.51k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
15.86k (x1.47)
TOTAL
65.64k
60.09k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
48.75k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
80.1k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
24.5k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
19.85k (x2.91)
TOTAL
142.69k
173.2k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4