Core i5-1035G4 vs FX 8350
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
600f20
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
9.85k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
8.41k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
3.58k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
6.32k (x0.6)
TOTAL
54.03k
28.16k (x0.52)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
44.93k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
45.21k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
22.81k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
5.19k (x0.77)
TOTAL
143.94k
118.14k (x0.82)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3934 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
9596 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5440 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2543 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2862 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
14601 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4