| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs FX 8320


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 8320 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.4 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
600f20
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
16.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
103.21k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
5.35k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
5.14k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
2.15k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
4.04k (x0.38)
TOTAL
54.03k
16.68k (x0.31)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

8320
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
36.79k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
40.2k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
19.57k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.66k (x0.99)
TOTAL
143.94k
103.21k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3934 points/W
322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522 points/W
157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
9596 points/W
826 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5440 points/GHz
1285 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2543 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2862 points/GHz
1010 points/GHz
TOTAL
14601 points/GHz
4171 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4