Core i5-1035G4 vs A9 9420
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 3.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 3.1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
670f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
46.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
2.56k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
9.97k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
2.96k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
2.12k (x0.2)
TOTAL
38.92k
17.61k (x0.45)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
3.88k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
9.26k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
3.9k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
1.74k (x0.26)
TOTAL
65.01k
18.79k (x0.29)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
8.41k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
11.48k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
3.29k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.24k (x0.39)
TOTAL
28.56k
25.41k (x0.89)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
11.25k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
13.69k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
2.09k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
1.87k (x0.27)
TOTAL
87.45k
28.89k (x0.33)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
7.55k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
13.9k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
3.11k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
2.18k (x0.21)
TOTAL
54.03k
26.74k (x0.49)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
9.09k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
12.25k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
3k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
1.81k (x0.27)
TOTAL
143.94k
26.15k (x0.18)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
11.74k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
16.05k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
3.26k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
2.05k (x0.19)
TOTAL
65.64k
33.09k (x0.5)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
18.57k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
20.11k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
5.27k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
2.38k (x0.35)
TOTAL
142.69k
46.33k (x0.32)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4