Core i5-1035G4 vs A6 9210
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 5.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 5.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
670f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
4.87k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
10.38k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.59k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.38k (x0.42)
TOTAL
28.56k
20.22k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
7.41k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
11.87k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
3.35k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.6k (x0.38)
TOTAL
87.45k
25.23k (x0.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
4.71k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
11.03k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
2.59k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
2.45k (x0.23)
TOTAL
54.03k
20.78k (x0.38)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
8.43k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
12.8k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
3.32k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
2.59k (x0.39)
TOTAL
143.94k
27.13k (x0.19)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3934 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
9596 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5440 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2543 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2862 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
14601 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4