Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-12400F
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
90675
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
7.43k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
18.64k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
13.15k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
14.82k (x1.41)
TOTAL
38.92k
54.04k (x1.39)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
36.23k (x4)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
134.76k (x3.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
84.06k (x5.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
16.71k (x2.48)
TOTAL
65.01k
271.76k (x4.18)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
24.18k (x3.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
23.85k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
14.42k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
14.87k (x2.63)
TOTAL
28.56k
77.32k (x2.71)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
122.98k (x4.87)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
168.77k (x4.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
96.11k (x5.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
16.32k (x2.36)
TOTAL
87.45k
404.19k (x4.62)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
24.24k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
24.74k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
13.95k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
14.47k (x1.37)
TOTAL
54.03k
77.41k (x1.43)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
126.87k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
186.48k (x3.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
92.37k (x4.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
15.45k (x2.31)
TOTAL
143.94k
421.18k (x2.93)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
33.85k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
20.33k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
10.51k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
11.77k (x1.09)
TOTAL
65.64k
76.46k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
174.21k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
141.31k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
64.86k (x3.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
19.01k (x2.79)
TOTAL
142.69k
399.39k (x2.8)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4