| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906a4
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
6.95k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
16.28k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
10.49k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
9.95k (x0.94)
TOTAL
38.92k
43.67k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
14.97k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
51.01k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
30.47k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
8.59k (x1.28)
TOTAL
65.01k
105.05k (x1.62)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
20.87k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
20.74k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
11.32k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
8.32k (x1.47)
TOTAL
28.56k
61.26k (x2.15)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
45.12k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
60.59k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
28.48k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
14.06k (x2.03)
TOTAL
87.45k
148.26k (x1.7)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
15.63k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
9.94k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
8.06k (x0.76)
TOTAL
54.03k
53.83k (x1)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
35.72k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
56.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
25k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
12.48k (x1.86)
TOTAL
143.94k
129.6k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
37.56k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
21.13k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
11.35k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
10.31k (x0.95)
TOTAL
65.64k
80.34k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
73.97k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
72.37k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
29.61k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
9.65k (x1.42)
TOTAL
142.69k
185.6k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4