| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i3-12100T


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
90675
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
6.88k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.36k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
12.26k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
13.49k (x1.28)
TOTAL
38.92k
49.98k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
22.03k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
84.16k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
46.49k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
8.96k (x1.33)
TOTAL
65.01k
161.65k (x2.49)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
22.39k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
22.29k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
13.37k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
13.72k (x2.42)
TOTAL
28.56k
71.76k (x2.51)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
76.69k (x3.03)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
104.06k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
53.2k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
8.86k (x1.28)
TOTAL
87.45k
242.81k (x2.78)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
22.25k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
23.16k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
13.09k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
13.21k (x1.25)
TOTAL
54.03k
71.7k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
77.43k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
109.08k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
52.45k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
8.75k (x1.31)
TOTAL
143.94k
247.71k (x1.72)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
43.24k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
23.76k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
12.67k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
13.88k (x1.28)
TOTAL
65.64k
93.54k (x1.43)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
150.28k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
126.29k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
45.32k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
8.73k (x1.28)
TOTAL
142.69k
330.62k (x2.32)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4