| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-11700


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 5.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0671
Core
Ice Lake-U
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
5.48k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
20.99k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
12.58k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
21.24k (x2.01)
TOTAL
38.92k
60.28k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
44.15k (x4.88)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
196.6k (x5.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
102.57k (x6.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
10.64k (x1.58)
TOTAL
65.01k
353.96k (x5.44)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
18.05k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
26.13k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
13.92k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
21.22k (x3.75)
TOTAL
28.56k
79.32k (x2.78)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
160.49k (x6.35)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
225.25k (x6.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
113.88k (x6.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
10.64k (x1.54)
TOTAL
87.45k
510.25k (x5.83)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
18.96k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
28.34k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
13.26k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
20.2k (x1.91)
TOTAL
54.03k
80.76k (x1.49)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
164.31k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
253.96k (x4.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
115.28k (x5.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
10.65k (x1.59)
TOTAL
143.94k
544.2k (x3.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
35.12k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
29.24k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
12.56k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
21.95k (x2.03)
TOTAL
65.64k
98.87k (x1.51)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
304k (x5.2)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
304.7k (x5.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
109.64k (x5.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
10.64k (x1.56)
TOTAL
142.69k
728.98k (x5.11)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4