| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 237.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806c1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
237.55k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.75k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.28k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
9.5k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
8.81k (x0.84)
TOTAL
38.92k
39.34k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
12.43k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
54.95k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
26.41k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
7.38k (x1.1)
TOTAL
65.01k
101.16k (x1.56)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
13.43k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
22.29k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
11.18k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
9.75k (x1.72)
TOTAL
28.56k
56.64k (x1.98)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
40.24k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
65.99k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
28.51k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
6.66k (x0.96)
TOTAL
87.45k
141.4k (x1.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
15.12k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
23.4k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
10.9k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
9.41k (x0.89)
TOTAL
54.03k
58.83k (x1.09)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
45.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
74.42k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
29.8k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
7.16k (x1.07)
TOTAL
143.94k
157.08k (x1.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
25.91k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
23.39k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
10.08k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
8.7k (x0.8)
TOTAL
65.64k
68.08k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
94.51k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
99.21k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
33.35k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
10.47k (x1.54)
TOTAL
142.69k
237.55k (x1.66)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
3375 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
374 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
8484 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2401 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2071 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16210 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4