| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
50654
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
12.29k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
3.64k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
6.55k (x0.76)
TOTAL
37.15k
25.46k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
20.42k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
95.83k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
30.88k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
9.7k (x1.92)
TOTAL
102.13k
156.83k (x1.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
18.78k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
16.25k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
3.99k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
6.8k (x0.83)
TOTAL
55.37k
45.82k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
133.55k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
108.43k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
30.02k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
9.48k (x1.71)
TOTAL
171.65k
281.48k (x1.64)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4