| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306c3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.45k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
9.96k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
4.26k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
4.27k (x0.5)
TOTAL
37.15k
21.94k (x0.59)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
14.01k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
37.68k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
17.05k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
7.35k (x1.46)
TOTAL
102.13k
76.09k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
19.17k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
10.55k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.79k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
4.65k (x0.56)
TOTAL
55.37k
39.16k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
73.13k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
42.06k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
18.03k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
7.54k (x1.36)
TOTAL
171.65k
140.76k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4