| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Pentium G4560


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.6 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
89.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
13.01k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
18.74k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.06k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
7.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
50.91k
44.21k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
27.22k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
43.79k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
11.74k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
7.16k (x1.3)
TOTAL
141.91k
89.91k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4