| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs m7-6Y75


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 164.9 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
406e3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
53.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
10.24k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
15.33k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
2.97k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
5.32k (x0.58)
TOTAL
51.7k
33.86k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
16.78k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
25.09k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
6.14k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
5.58k (x1.03)
TOTAL
164.94k
53.58k (x0.32)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3750 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4916 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1971 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
10996 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3772 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5424 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2603 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2563 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
14362 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4