| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i7-950


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
106a5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
76.29k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
8.01k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
5.38k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
3.11k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
2.96k (x0.31)
TOTAL
50.91k
19.46k (x0.38)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
31.53k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
24.16k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
15.84k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
4.75k (x0.86)
TOTAL
141.91k
76.29k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
587 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4