| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i7-9700K


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 2.7 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
460.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
29.3k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
25.61k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
5.86k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
12.86k (x1.56)
TOTAL
55.37k
73.62k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
217.77k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
190.46k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
40.48k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
11.31k (x2.04)
TOTAL
171.65k
460.02k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
4842 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4