| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i7-4702MQ


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306c3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.45k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
8.53k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
3.99k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.51k (x0.41)
TOTAL
37.15k
19.47k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
11.93k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
42.4k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
18k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
3.6k (x0.71)
TOTAL
102.13k
75.92k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
18.98k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
9.5k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.32k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
3.99k (x0.48)
TOTAL
55.37k
36.8k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
74.75k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
47.72k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
19.65k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
3.02k (x0.55)
TOTAL
171.65k
145.15k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4