| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i5-8300H


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ea
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
23.6k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
21.72k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.61k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
6.8k (x0.82)
TOTAL
55.37k
56.72k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
79.12k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
81.27k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
17.46k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
4.62k (x0.83)
TOTAL
171.65k
182.47k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4