| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i5-10600K


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
74.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
365.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
30.27k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
26.42k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
6.07k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
11.33k (x1.37)
TOTAL
55.37k
74.09k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
164.69k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
156.45k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
37.39k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
7.15k (x1.29)
TOTAL
171.65k
365.67k (x2.13)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1317 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
1252 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
2925 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5505 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15436 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4