Core i5-1035G1 vs i5-10400
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
68.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
372.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
26.43k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
23.89k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
5.63k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
12.1k (x1.47)
TOTAL
55.37k
68.04k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
163.14k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
161.5k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
39.94k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
7.6k (x1.37)
TOTAL
171.65k
372.19k (x2.17)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2510 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
117 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
5726 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5555 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2814 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4