| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0652
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
15.65k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
23.13k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
5.66k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
11.43k (x1.24)
TOTAL
51.7k
55.87k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
26.77k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
43.81k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
10.17k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
11.91k (x2.21)
TOTAL
164.94k
92.66k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
27.14k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
24.75k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
5.73k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
11.84k (x1.44)
TOTAL
55.37k
69.47k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
105.77k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
107.47k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
24.82k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
8.02k (x1.45)
TOTAL
171.65k
246.07k (x1.43)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4