| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i5-10210U


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
22.96k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
20.8k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.76k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
7.5k (x0.91)
TOTAL
55.37k
56.03k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
66.43k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
62.38k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
14.52k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
4.45k (x0.8)
TOTAL
171.65k
147.78k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4