| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i3-9100T


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906eb
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
192.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.79k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
15.65k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
4.59k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
7.78k (x0.9)
TOTAL
37.15k
31.81k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
13.97k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
57.83k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
17.03k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
4.35k (x0.86)
TOTAL
102.13k
93.18k (x0.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
13.74k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
19.7k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
4.86k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
8.61k (x0.9)
TOTAL
50.91k
46.91k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
50.5k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
72.58k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
18.09k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
4.28k (x0.78)
TOTAL
141.91k
145.45k (x1.02)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
13.6k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
20.58k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
4.76k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
8.8k (x0.95)
TOTAL
51.7k
47.74k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
50.18k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
75.99k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
17.66k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
4.12k (x0.76)
TOTAL
164.94k
147.95k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
24.89k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
21.82k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.83k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.63k (x1.05)
TOTAL
55.37k
60.16k (x1.09)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
89.4k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
81.19k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
18.06k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
4.24k (x0.77)
TOTAL
171.65k
192.88k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4