| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 141.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 2.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
706a1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
1.68k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
5.29k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
2.75k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.44k (x0.4)
TOTAL
37.15k
13.16k (x0.35)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
6.39k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
20.02k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
10.22k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
4.94k (x0.98)
TOTAL
102.13k
41.57k (x0.41)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
4.9k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
7.26k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
2.75k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3.32k (x0.35)
TOTAL
50.91k
18.22k (x0.36)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
18.84k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
27.45k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
10.35k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
4.85k (x0.88)
TOTAL
141.91k
61.49k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3337 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4407 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1349 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
368 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
9461 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3580 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5153 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2759 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2650 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
14142 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4