| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 9 3900X


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 4.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
756.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
4.46k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
18.46k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
8.05k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
23.71k (x2.76)
TOTAL
37.15k
54.68k (x1.47)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
52.65k (x3.6)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
265.41k (x4.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
140.78k (x5.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
46.91k (x9.3)
TOTAL
102.13k
505.76k (x4.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
17.35k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
25.87k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
8.72k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
27.86k (x2.92)
TOTAL
50.91k
79.8k (x1.57)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
201.57k (x4.03)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
284.41k (x4.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
145.16k (x7.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
100.56k (x18.24)
TOTAL
141.91k
731.7k (x5.16)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
16.95k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
25.37k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
9.23k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
24.83k (x2.69)
TOTAL
51.7k
76.38k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
196.31k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
290.5k (x3.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
143.95k (x4.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
64.92k (x12.03)
TOTAL
164.94k
695.69k (x4.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
16.73k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
24.74k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
8.82k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
22.22k (x2.7)
TOTAL
55.37k
72.51k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
248.24k (x3.4)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
309.66k (x4.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
140.01k (x5.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
58.39k (x10.55)
TOTAL
171.65k
756.3k (x4.41)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
7203 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4