| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
800f11
Core
Ice Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
13.95k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
22.02k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
5.17k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
16.61k (x1.8)
TOTAL
51.7k
57.75k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
120.59k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
197.34k (x2.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
56.83k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
6.41k (x1.19)
TOTAL
164.94k
381.16k (x2.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
12.65k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
20.95k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.63k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
14.47k (x1.76)
TOTAL
55.37k
52.69k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
101.78k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
177.57k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
47.18k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
6.78k (x1.22)
TOTAL
171.65k
333.31k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4