| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 5 5600X


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a20f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
435.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
23.28k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
25.58k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
11.72k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
25.45k (x3.09)
TOTAL
55.37k
86.03k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
135.28k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
180.56k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
80.27k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
38.94k (x7.03)
TOTAL
171.65k
435.05k (x2.53)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
6693 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4