Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
4.2k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
17.36k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
7.5k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
23.79k (x2.77)
TOTAL
37.15k
52.85k (x1.42)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
22.11k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
108.04k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
56.81k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
36.39k (x7.21)
TOTAL
102.13k
223.36k (x2.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
15.38k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
21.94k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
7.97k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
24.76k (x2.6)
TOTAL
50.91k
70.05k (x1.38)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
96.91k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
135.12k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
70.39k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
56.43k (x10.23)
TOTAL
141.91k
358.85k (x2.53)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
15.04k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
20.95k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
8.57k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
21.71k (x2.35)
TOTAL
51.7k
66.27k (x1.28)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
94.36k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
141.73k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
69.38k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
32.72k (x6.07)
TOTAL
164.94k
338.19k (x2.05)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
16.04k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
24.47k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
8.38k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
21.66k (x2.63)
TOTAL
55.37k
70.55k (x1.27)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
113.63k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
143.55k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
63.84k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
27.34k (x4.94)
TOTAL
171.65k
348.35k (x2.03)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4