| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.24k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
13.16k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
4.41k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.32k (x0.39)
TOTAL
37.15k
24.12k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
12.95k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
57.84k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
21.05k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
3.51k (x0.7)
TOTAL
102.13k
95.36k (x0.93)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
11.98k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
15.85k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
4.53k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
3.29k (x0.35)
TOTAL
50.91k
35.65k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
48.28k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
74.19k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
23.29k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.47k (x0.63)
TOTAL
141.91k
149.23k (x1.05)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
11.1k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
18.97k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
3.9k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
3.39k (x0.37)
TOTAL
51.7k
37.37k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
45.74k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
75.47k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
21.89k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
3.49k (x0.65)
TOTAL
164.94k
146.6k (x0.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
10.88k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
18.09k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.29k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
3.36k (x0.41)
TOTAL
55.37k
36.64k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
42.44k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
73.82k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
20.76k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
3.96k (x0.72)
TOTAL
171.65k
140.97k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4