| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
800f82
Core
Ice Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.41k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
15.96k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
4.69k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
17.42k (x2.03)
TOTAL
37.15k
41.47k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
20.88k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
110.37k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
39.25k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
6.66k (x1.32)
TOTAL
102.13k
177.16k (x1.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
13.83k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
23.16k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
5.15k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
15.18k (x1.84)
TOTAL
55.37k
57.33k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
83.44k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
161.53k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
40.62k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
6.72k (x1.21)
TOTAL
171.65k
292.31k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4