Core i5-1035G1 vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
800f11
Core
Ice Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
13.67k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
22.28k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
4.99k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
15.22k (x1.85)
TOTAL
55.37k
56.16k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-1035G1
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
81.03k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
145.84k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
39.14k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
6.79k (x1.23)
TOTAL
171.65k
272.8k (x1.59)
Performance/W
i5-1035G1
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4