| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs FX 9590


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 164.9 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
600f20
Core
Ice Lake-U
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
137.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
11.51k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
9.57k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
4.19k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
7.14k (x0.77)
TOTAL
51.7k
32.41k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

9590
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
55.13k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
51.69k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
27.02k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
3.81k (x0.71)
TOTAL
164.94k
137.65k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3750 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4916 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1971 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
10996 points/W
626 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3772 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5424 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2603 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2563 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
14362 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4