| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i7-11700


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 4.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0671
Core
Ice Lake-U
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
5.48k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
20.99k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
12.58k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
21.24k (x2.47)
TOTAL
37.15k
60.28k (x1.62)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
44.15k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
196.6k (x3.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
102.57k (x3.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
10.64k (x2.11)
TOTAL
102.13k
353.96k (x3.47)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
18.05k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
26.13k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
13.92k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
21.22k (x2.22)
TOTAL
50.91k
79.32k (x1.56)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
160.49k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
225.25k (x3.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
113.88k (x5.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
10.64k (x1.93)
TOTAL
141.91k
510.25k (x3.6)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
18.96k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
28.34k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
13.26k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
20.2k (x2.19)
TOTAL
51.7k
80.76k (x1.56)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
164.31k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
253.96k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
115.28k (x3.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
10.65k (x1.97)
TOTAL
164.94k
544.2k (x3.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
35.12k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
29.24k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
12.56k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
21.95k (x2.66)
TOTAL
55.37k
98.87k (x1.79)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
304k (x4.16)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
304.7k (x4.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
109.64k (x4.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
10.64k (x1.92)
TOTAL
171.65k
728.98k (x4.25)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4